Better than me

this drone fits well

Come on.

It can be seen that the design was still very serious, but it is estimated that the design was not deep enough, and many things should be changed temporarily during modeling. In fact, the unmanned aerial vehicle looks OK as a whole, but the above holes are really a little hasty. The breakfast machine didn't quite understand and didn't make an evaluation. The mite remover wants to take the millet style at first sight, but the millet thing looks simple, but every detail is done very well. You can only have its shape at first sight and have not mastered the essence. Another biggest problem is that the rendering technology is a little perfunctory. Many materials are directly attached to the default material of ks, and you can use which one feels better. The texture of the map has not been adjusted, the light is relatively single, and there is no post-processing. However, it seems that the basic skills are still good. Come on, students!!!

This drone is a reference to Altman's

This drone looks like water at first sight, brother

How do you say, are you sure this is a collection of works, not a display of works (you can't see a little typesetting)? Moreover, take unmanned aerial vehicles as an example. Are so many holes buckled only for the sake of richer product shapes (the shapes should consider the actual use)? Are the large fuselage and wings so small that they can be produced or did they not consider production at the beginning? As a student of industrial design product design, I think basic rigor needs some

Come on.

good

The appearance should be strengthened

Drones in general

good

very good