A few days ago, I just registered Puxiang and sent out some works, which attracted many angry youths to vent. Today, I will educate this humble group on this matter. They preach the so-called hypocritical and ridiculous sense of justice under the slogan of discrimination against plagiarists. However, I am not sure about the concept of plagiarism, reference and imitation. Some angry youths said that it was the same as the scene diagram of other people's problems. I smiled. According to your logic, did Baidu have to personally issue the material diagram to sue me for infringement? Does the original author of my material picture still have to sue the gold medal works of Jiangxi industrial competition? When you think you have experienced countless experiences and caught a similar work that you don't want to spray, have you ever thought that originality is also through learning and the integration of resources in various places? Of course, you don't have to think about it. The thrill of knocking on the keyboard and swearing has gone to your head. This is the last time I have educated you, the comment area will not reply.
In the last comment, someone said that the gold medal works of Tiangong Cup were specially checked. I have done a good job in all aspects, and I have to admit that this person is excellent. The general elephant spray also agreed that this is original.
Since the document a few months ago expired, I also forgot where I saw this picture. The first time I saw this picture was about two or three years ago. As for the similarity with the gold medal, I believe I don't need to say that anyone imitates anyone. I don't need to argue too much. After all, qualified people don't pick up their mobile phones and start spraying when they see something like these sprays.
What's interesting is that the organizer of this time is the most concerned about copyright issues among all the competitions I participated in. Refusing to plagiarize one draft and vote more was repeatedly emphasized in the group for several days. In the end, many shortlisted works were disqualified.
I believe that this work is no stranger to all the awards in major competitions. First of all, I admire this designer's good design concept, modeling and rendering. This work is also on the shortlist but was eventually disqualified.
South Korea doesn't say much about a few years ago.
This year's second prize in Hunan province's big industry competition happened to be at the scene. do you have to spray the same concept and belong to plagiarism? be a person, loser. do you really understand design and China's current design environment? which product does not need to be improved and does not need to be designed again?
Don't say that these dutiful sprays are really professional. I'm afraid I can't see my other works one by one. Have you just been bereaved recently or have you been killed by Lao Wang Lu next door? Oh, by the way, how can you have a girlfriend.
Looking at the commonness of this group of spurts, it is always inseparable from self-righteous words, which are always so harsh and have specially hung an id of "network justice person" for himself. He has spoken boldly on major design platforms. He has heard that he is guilty of defamation and is sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention, public surveillance or deprivation of political rights. However, as a person with pattern and tolerance, he, talk is not a level.
Take a closer look at the homepage of these rat shit, zero originality, zero reprint, live a picture of the Internet virgin, spray people is very sophisticated, seniority knowledge so deep also can't see you send some works, is it because you don't have time to do design? Also on this spray run, no original no one can spray. If you don't guess wrong, your life must also be sad. Is it because you spend your parents' hard-earned money on an ordinary secondary college that can't find a good job, or are you working as a social animal with a salary that can't support you?
Finally, I attach the picture of my modeling. Those who understand it naturally understand it. Fools will still spray after reading it. Libel alone is enough to let the spray boys go in and squat for a few years. Why don't you do more design to support your elderly parents when you have this time? I can scold you for the length of a paper without dirty words, and you can only turn over and over those vulgar words. However, no matter what I say, there will always be points for spraying, reports and appeals at will. Seeing this senior and high-quality designer, most of them must have given me a positive attitude, and the fans have been excited to play freely in the comment area. It is good for you to enjoy yourself, which can also attract a lot of heat for my posts. May there be more spray in heaven and a pure land in the general comment area. Welcome all high-quality and qualified designers and students to exchange and learn design problems. Those who have design problems can also ask me. I will do my best to help you. I wish all well-educated designers numerous awards, soaring wages and good night.
The copyright of this work belongs to 设计鬼才. No use is allowed without explicit permission from owner.
New user?Create an account
Log In Reset your password.Account existed?Log In
Read and agree to the User Agreement Terms of Use.
Please enter your email to reset your password
You are so similar in typesetting that you can't even copy it, let alone "original". if you really think of the idea and do it yourself, you are still rendering the angle. the similarity between the small logo of the character position and the placement of the title and the gold medal work is as high as 99%? It's like reducing transparency and copying someone else's page? How dare you say you haven't seen this gold medal work? So blatant? It's really a confusing behavior in the world......
Is there any reason for plagiarism? If you change the color matching, you dare to say that you are original? If you laugh, if you build a model according to the drawing, you dare to say that you are original?? I think your modeling ability is also the same, and this level is still in line with this force.
https://www.puxiang.com/galleries/0d41226a2ad8a9dc27f434b43b6d0b93看看这个17年的
I think even if you don't copy this wave of reports, you will be sure.
It's really rare. I also ate the crowd once and read all the posts. They are all childish things, just like what I said in the university, how can I do this square box, how can he be good. Oh, by the way, there is a question. Did you make the model yourself?
https://www.puxiang.com/galleries/e05afdcdcd285b82d9c8fd090ac2460a这是他抄袭的证据
In fact, this kind of person enters the company, enters the industry, and then is also a moth in the industry. He may copy an explanation, and then, when exposed, the company will directly take this kind of plagiarism designer. After that, the times and all aspects of society have progressed, and after people's awareness of anti-counterfeiting has increased, this kind of garbage will be directly blocked by the industry.
That is the concept of others.
3. He just plagiarizes, plagiarizes modeling, typesetting, rough, this kind of person also boasts that it is an improvement.
Picking up people's teeth
Just this mask, it seems that there is not much difference in comparison....
Plagiarism is not enough, plagiarism itself is a false proposition. If the original author has a utility patent, it involves infringement. I don't think the appearance patent has reached the level of infringement. But the entire typesetting concept is highly similar to the past award-winning works, which should not be a promoted thing. Everyone wants to see highly original and mature domestic design, obviously this design is not. However, if the design is plagiarized, let the patent department evaluate it.
With all due respect, I did it in general.
Do you think others can't build these models? This work is simply copied and pasted. Since you also know that plagiarism is not good, why do you do it. Since you have chosen this industry, you really can't guarantee the words and deeds of others, but at least it's not more excessive plagiarism. Our eyes are really not blind. If it is to do our own design and have our own pursuit, it should not be the case. If it's just to make money, it's better to change the industry.
...
To learn from others, one must be grateful and respect them. For example, some people in China have copied and borrowed from others and even ridiculed the object of running on the learning. This kind of behavior is very shameless.
https://www.puxiang.com/galleries/e05afdcdcd285b82d9c8fd090ac2460a抄袭石锤