Road auxiliary marking printing car light spray......
2022-06-24
Automotive Design
4872
97
40
Follow
Message
Ha, ha, ha, I think it's quite good that the author is afraid of offended someone
If this car is crushed,
The comment area means that this thing has such a concept that no one else can design , whether it is original or plagiarism, is this kind of thing still rare? the author is afraid that he has offended anyone, did you rob somebody else's girlfriend (joking)
I would like to reply to something about the originality downstairs. The commercial products on the market do involve reference and imitation, such as Huawei and Apple, Xiaomi and Wuyin. Under the condition of patent avoidance, the design competition and similar products will promote the market and diversify the commodities on the market.
But for this plagiarist, this is originally a conceptual design work. You can understand it as a paper. The initial author of this paper raised questions, proposed solutions, verified the rationality of the scheme, and did a lot of homework. If anyone wants to continue research on the basis of this paper, they should at least propose more new things and mark the original cited. However, the plagiarist copied the concept, solution, even typesetting method and product details of the original work without changing the medicine, and then labeled the original with great shame, which is already a kind of theft of other people's intellectual property rights. I hope you can read more books for a few years and then judge the profound problem of plagiarism boundary.
I want to know, are all designers absolutely original designers? when designing products of our own company, there is no place similar to others? there is no place for reference? if there are so many original designers, it is really great.
The strangest thing is that when he privately believed to me, he also said that the tail device of the original work was not possible, which I also know, but why did this work have to be copied? Now that we already know the original defects, why can't we add some of our own ideas to improve it, shouldn't it be to add some of our own ideas to the original ideas for reference?
I don't understand why people treat this once-in-a-century genius like this? he is the light of mankind!
Crazzy! genius idea! Cross-century design! Every family should have one !!!
I did a good job. I hope I can see your own works next time.
First put the original author link
https://www.puxiang.com/galleries/36245711fa58f912740f335fe6f00256?favorite=true
Secondly, I am not here to lead the war, but to objectively explain the similarities of this work. As shown in the figure.
Can understand that imitation is the only way to improve design, but on that basis should not be improved and changed? In the content published by the author of this article, except for the styling, you can call it redesign, after all, the concept, rendering is very similar, I believe you know better. It is a friendly exchange to publish with the consent of the original author, isn't it? Guess why the system can't save pictures and the label of "original works, copyright protection" appears. Instead of clamoring under the verification of others, it is better to think of some new and good concepts. I believe that the "original" designer who has already worked has this ability.
This friend named "September is not September", you may also be engaged in design related majors, then you should know that many design outputs are ideological things now, not only the change of modeling and the use of basic forms in your mouth, but also hope that your design in the future will not embark on the road of 3 years of creation and 9 years of rights protection. Good luck.
If the original author is more sensitive to similar works, I think the similarities that passers-by can find out are really embezzled to a large extent. I also hope that the designer named "Z" and "September is not September" can make more wonderful original works.
Wow, that's great. Take it to the red dot and you will definitely win the prize!!!!!!!!
It's quite good
This copy of the work is well modeled, the product details are copied in place, and the rendering is also good. Although it cannot reflect the design thinking, it also shows that the aesthetics is not bad to find a good copy of the work, surpassing 30% of peers. The new era of modeling artists can be expected in the future.
The shape is smooth, the design process is also very smooth, ha ha
It is really possible to plagiarize the modeling details.
Is this look really good? It feels like it's pieced together. Moreover, it is very similar to the concept that Puxiang sent before, and it cannot be used for reference. Is the current design circle atmosphere like this?