The copyright of this work belongs to 刘小飞. No use is allowed without explicit permission from owner.
New user?Create an account
Log In Reset your password.Account existed?Log In
Read and agree to the User Agreement Terms of Use.
Please enter your email to reset your password
I think it's a good idea. I think it's a bit cheap. if I use it together, I don't think the ipad should have any pressure, like a learning machine? How is the base disassembled? Is the base design simple or crude? Is there a soft rubber pad? How is the back handled? Compared with existing products, is packaging and storage an advantage? Is the overall chamfer optimized? Does it feel a little direct? Fillet or chamfer? Should the characteristics of iape products be combined? Can I refer to the keyboard effect diagram of the logic? The buttons are like circles and squares, in order to distinguish the functional areas? Modern computer and traditional calculator integration form?
I work in a magnesium alloy processing and manufacturing enterprise. I wonder if you have considered making magnesium alloy in this design? (Not aluminum-magnesium alloy, but magnesium alloy with magnesium content of more than 90%)
Personally, I think the oblique key is very inconvenient. Compared with typing, it still requires the user to "poke" the key, which is not only inefficient, but also causes the device to slide back or the center of gravity to be unstable. Finally, the user utilization rate of this function will be relatively low. What I want is to enlarge the highest frequency numbers and basic operators. It doesn't matter if the rest is completely discarded. If the user really needs to use it, just use it in the ipad. If external use is not more concise and practical than internal use, the meaning of its existence is reduced, isn't it
Great. Is there a product for this?